THE PROBLEM
5/8/202411 min read
The resulting problem
Overview of some primary existing forces in human behavior now
Once upon a grim time, humanity found itself locked in a terrible cycle. Power, a seductive force, whispered promises of control, fueling endless struggles for dominance.This hunger for power painted history with the blood of countless battles, fueled by both righteous and twisted beliefs.Righteous banners, emblazoned with religious fervor, clashed on battlefields. Men, convinced of their divine right, spilled blood in the name of their gods.
Meanwhile, cunning politicians, hungry for personal gain, manipulated the masses, silencing dissent and hoarding resources.Fear became a tool. Ruthless leaders choked the life out of freedom with propaganda and censorship, their iron grip controlling information and crushing any voice that dared to rise against them.
Greed too, played its wicked part. Nations lusted for land and wealth, their insatiable hunger driving wars that ravaged the land and left a trail of suffering in their wake.Even within seemingly fair SOCIALstructures, power found a way to concentrate itself. Like a creeping vine, it choked out representation and innovation, leaving fertile ground for conflict.
The most chilling consequence of this relentless pursuit of power was the dehumanization of others.When a group is deemed different, less than human, violence becomes a horrifyingly easy choice.
The weight of this darkness is heavy, a grim reminder of the atrocities committed when humanity forgets its empathy.But power can be wielded for good too. It can be used to expose the lies, to amplify the voices of dissent, and to build bridges instead of walls. The fight against the stranglehold of this darkness is an ongoing story, a narrative yet to be written.
Will we choose the path of cooperation and understanding, or will we remain prisoners of the cycle of domination? Some experts believe that humans are hardwired to want power and control over others. This can quickly turn into aggression, especially when those desires are not met.Throughout history, small groups of people have been ruled by oppressive leaders until the people eventually rise up and overthrow them. Sadly, this often starts the cycle all over again.
IT's A BROAD SUBJECT - IT's USE AFFECTS US IN MANY ASPECTS
Throughout history, humanity has been plagued by aggression, wars, and violence. This darkness stems from a complex interplay of factors, rooted in our pursuit of power and control The Shadow of Power: Why We Hurt Each Otther
The Hunger for Domination:Deep-seated human desires for power and control can escalate into aggression, especially when frustrated.Thisis is evident in the historical cycle of oppressive regimes, uprisings, and the constant struggle for dominance.
Intense religious views nd beliefs have been used to justify wars or harm others.
Manipulate the public Some people seek power and control in politics as a way. This can often lead to the suppression of opposition and the misuse of resou
Desire for authoritarian regimes, ensorship, and even economic coercion. Misuse of politics attempts to control people Economic or territorial ambitions have been the root of many wars and conflicts throughout history. The Iron Law of Oligarchy states that in any organization, a small elite group of people will end up gaining and holding power. This can lead to a lack of representation and the stifling of innovation and dissent.
Elaboration on Reasons
1. Innate Desire for Power and Control:
Deep-seated human instincts for power and control can escalate into aggression when those desires are unmet.
This is evident in the historical cycle of oppressive leadership followed by uprisings and the reemergence of power imbalances.
2. Religious Extremism:
Intense religious beliefs have been used to justify acts of violence and harm inflicted on those perceived as different or threatening.
Wars and conflicts have been fought based on religious divides, with each side claiming divine justification.
3. Political Ambitions and Manipulation:
People seeking power and control in politics often resort to manipulating the public, suppressing opposition, and misusing resources for their own gain.
This can lead to political instability, oppression, and social unrest.
4. Abuse and Misuse of Political Power:
Authoritarian regimes, propaganda, censorship, and economic coercion are all examples of the misuse of political power to control people.
These tactics aim to suppress dissent, prevent the free flow of information, and consolidate authority among a select few.
5. Economic and Territorial Ambitions:
Throughout history, economic gain and territorial expansion have been major drivers of wars and conflicts.
Nations and groups have sought to acquire resources, wealth, and land at the expense of others.
6. Iron Law of Oligarchy:
In any organization, a small group of elites tends to accumulate power and decision-making authority.
This leads to a lack of representation, stifled innovation, and the suppression of opposition, creating conditions ripe for conflict.
7. Dehumanization of Others:
When individuals or groups are perceived as different or inferior, it becomes easier to justify violence and aggression against them.
This is evident in historical atrocities such as the Holocaust and genocides, where entire groups of people were systematically dehumanized and targete
Religion and Violence:
Intense religious beliefs can be twisted to justify violence against those deemed different or threatening.
Wars have been fought on religious fault lines, with each side claiming divine right.
The Corrupting Power of Politics:
Politicians seeking power may resort to manipulating the public, silencing opposition, and misusing resources for personal gain.
This fuels political instability, oppression, and social unrest, creating a breeding ground for violence.
Controlling the Masses:
Authoritarian regimes, propaganda, censorship, and economic coercion are tools used to suppress dissent, control information, and concentrate power.
By silencing opposition and hindering free thought, these tactics pave the way for conflict and injustice.
Greed and Territorial Ambitions:Economic gain and territorial expansion have been major drivers of wars throughout history.Nations and groups have sought resources, wealth, and land at the expense of others, leading to widespread devastation.
“The Iron Fist of Oligarchy:”The "Iron Law of Oligarchy" posits that power inevitably concentrates in the hands of a few, regardless of initial structure.This creates a lack of representation, stifles innovation, and suppresses opposition, breeding conflict.
Dehumanization: Making Others Less Than Human:When individuals or groups are perceived as different or inferior, violence becomes easier to justify.This is chillingly evident in atrocities like the Holocaust, where entire groups were dehumanized and targeted for destruction.
METHODS of How Power is Used
Authoritarianism: Suppressing opposition, limiting freedoms, and rigging elections to maintain control. This undermines democracy, silences dissent, and perpetuates inequality.
Propaganda and Misinformation: promote reading biased narratives, demonizing opponents, and maniufacturing lies and censorship. This undermines individual autonomy, stifles critical thinking, and erodes trust in institutions.
Repression of Dissent: Using censorship, surveillance, harassment, and imprisonment to silence dissenters and intimidate opponents. This violates basic freedoms, stifles free speech, and creates a climate of fear.
Political Patronage and Nepotism: Rewarding loyal supporters with jobs, contracts, or privileges to consolidate power and create a system of corruption. This undermines public trust, erodes meritocracy, and perpetuates inequality.
Polarization and Division: Exploiting social, ethnic, religious, or ideological divisions to sow discord and consolidate power. This leads to increased social tensions, discrimination, and a breakdown of social cohesion.
Economic Coercion: Using economic incentives or threats to force compliance with political agendas. This undermines economic freedom, perpetuates inequality, and limits individual choice.
Manipulation of Institutions: Weakening democratic institutions like the judiciary, legislature, or media to consolidate power and avoid accountability. This weakens checks and balances, undermines the rule of law, and erodes public trust.
The Iron Law of Oligarchy: Even democratic systems can fall prey to power concentration among a select few, undermining demo The Price We Pay
These tactics have severe consequences for individual rights and freedoms:
Erosion of Individual Autonomy: Restricts freedom of thought, expression, and participation in political processes.
Suppression of Dissent and Innovation: Stifles dissent, critical thinking, and new ideas.
Weakening of Democratic Institutions: Erodes trust in government and undermines the rule of law.
Perpetuation of Inequality and Injustice: Concentrates power in the hands of a few, limiting social mobility and access to justice.
Erosion of Social Cohesion: Increases social tensions, discrimination, and weakens a shared sense of community.
Undermining of Human Dignity: Treats people as instruments of political power, violating basic human rights and dignity.
Understanding these dark forces is crucial to building a future where cooperation and empathy replace violence and domination.
The Grip of Power
OLIGARCHIES -- Sociological and Power Dynamics
According to the sources, the emergence of oligarchies is influenced by sociological and power dynamics, including:
Specialization and Hierarchy: As organizations grow in size and complexity, they require specialized roles and hierarchical structures to manage operations efficiently. However, these structures often concentrate power in the hands of a few individuals or groups, leading to oligarchic tendencies.
Bureaucratic Inertia: Once an oligarchic elite is established, they develop a vested interest in maintaining their position and resisting change. This can create bureaucratic inertia, preventing the emergence of new leaders or the implementation of innovative ideas.
Leadership Skills: Individuals with exceptional leadership skills, resources, or charisma tend to rise to the top of organizations. Over time, these leaders may consolidate their power and influence, establishing an oligarchy.
Absence of Counterbalancing Forces: In the absence of strong counterbalancing forces, such as democratic institutions or independent oversight mechanisms, oligarchies can flourish. These forces can hold the elite accountable and prevent the concentration of excessive power.
Dynamics of Aggression, Wars-Attempts to Hurt Human Beings
FINANCIAL CONTROL
It's a common belief that governments of the world's largest economies control the global financial system. However, this belief is a misconception. While governments do have power over their respective economies, the real control and funding come from major banks and large corporations. These financial giants wield significant influence over governments. Research by Swiss academics reveals that a small group of highly interconnected transnational companies, primarily banks, hold disproportionate power over the global economy.
Research conducted by Swiss academics reveals that a small group of superconnected transnational companies, primarily banks, holds disproportionate power over the global economy. Approximately 1,300 companies collectively own a significant portion of the world's large blue-chip and manufacturing firms, representing the "real" economy. Within this group, 147 companies form a tightly knit "super-entity," controlling 40% of the entire network. Many of these companies are financial institutions, including Barclays Bank, JPMorgan Chase & Co, and The Goldman Sachs Group. .
They overwhelmingly support policies aimed at making the economy fairer, holding corporate executives accountable, strengthening environmental and consumer protections, and reforming the political system to serve everyone's interests, not just Big Money donors. the top 1% the corporate class, including large financial institutions, doesn't align with this agenda and exerts significant influence over politics.
Despite widespread public support for various policies, these changes are often stymied by corporate interests. , a significant majority of Americans support policies such as a higher minimum wage, opposing corporate trade deals, breaking up big banks, and regulating financial services more strictly. Americans also want to expand Social Security benefits, close tax loopholes, and impose higher taxes on the wealthy. . They also support empowering Medicare to negotiate drug prices.
However, these views often clash with the interests of powerful corporations. The problem lies in the political power wielded by the corporate class, campaign finance, including secret money in elections
In summary, the world economy is not solely controlled by governments but heavily influenced by big banks and large corporations. While Americans largely agree on various policy issues, the challenge lies in the corporate class's dominance in politics, which often thwarts the implementation of these policies despite widespread public support. Blackrock ‘s assets are greater than the combined worth of many entire countries .
The problem is that the corporate class doesn't agree with this agenda, and that class dominates our politics .
Larry Fink is the co-founder and CEO of BlackRock, a global investment management firm headquartered in New York City. Under his leadership, BlackRock has grown to become one of the most influential financial institutions in the world.
The association between Larry Fink and Henry Kissinger lies in their roles as members of the International Advisory Board of the BlackRock Investment Institute. The BlackRock Investment Institute is a research arm of BlackRock that provides insights and analysis on global economic and investment trends. Henry Kissinger joined the International Advisory Board of the BlackRock Investment Institute in 2015. Blackrock and together other largr corps seems to be a key supporter of the World Economic Forum (WEF) headed by a European banker Claus Schwab.They propose "Stackholder" governance ,not our familiar democracy and republic.
This board is composed of prominent experts and leaders from various fields, including economics, politics, and finance, who provide strategic advice and insights to BlackRock. Larry Fink, as the CEO of BlackRock, likely interacts with the members of this advisory board, including Henry Kissinger. Henry Kissinger i has helped the nation in many areas. He however does have different opinions about treatment of the US in general situations. .
"Who controls the food supply controls the people who controls the energy can control whole continents who controls money can control the world." — Henry Kissinger
“The logic of war is power, and power has no inherent limit. The logic of peace is proportion, and proportion implies limitation.” ― Henry Kissinger,
LARRY FINK quote : “DEI an investment criteria for you – well, behaviors are going to have to change and this is one thing we're going to. We're asking companies , you have to force behaviors and at BlackRock we are forcing behaviors, 54 of the incoming class are women we added four more points in terms of diverse uh employment this year and it will if it's you know what we're doing internally is – if you don't achieve these levels of impact your compensation could be impacted – okay we're doing the same thing and so it's just it you have to force behaviors and if you don't force behaviors whether it's gender or race or just any way you want to say the composition of your team you're going to be impacted and that's not just not recruiting it is development as Ken said and ultimately it's still going to take time but I am just as much shocked as Ken is that we have not seen more opportunities and we're going to have to force change .”
These comments were made with regard to ESG and DEI requirements. This of course has been challenged by stockholders of many of their corporate holdings. Certainly!
Here's a rewording of : UNDERSTANDING FINANCIAL CONTROL AND INFLUENCE
Approximately 1,300 companies collectively own a significant portion of the world's large blue-chip and manufacturing firms, representing the "real" economy. Within this group, 147 companies form a tightly knit "superentity," controlling 40% of the entire network.
Many of these companies are financial institutions, such as Barclays Bank, JPMorgan Chase & Co, and The Goldman Sachs Group. Interestingly, a significant majority of Americans support policies aimed at making the economy fairer, holding corporate executives accountable, strengthening environmental and consumer protections, and reforming the political system to serve everyone's interests, not just big money donors.
However, these views often clash with the interests of powerful corporations. The challenge lies in the political power wielded by the corporate class, which includes large financial institutions. Despite widespread public support for various policies, such as a higher minimum wage, opposing corporate trade deals, breaking up big banks, and regulating financial services more strictly, these changes are often stymied by corporate interests.
Americans also want to expand Social Security benefits, close tax loopholes, impose higher taxes on the wealthy, and empower Medicare to negotiate drug prices. There is a recognition among politicians and pundits that Americans want policies to make the economy more fair and hold corporate executives accountable.
They want stronger environmental and consumer protections, and they want to fix the political system so that it serves the interest of all, not just big money donors. As one expert noted, "These aren't close issues for Americans; actually, what's surprising is the degree of national consensus."
The problem, however, is that the corporate class, which dominates politics, doesn't agree with this agenda. In summary, while Americans largely agree on various policy issues aimed at creating a fairer and more accountable economic system, the challenge lies in the corporate class's dominance in politics, which often thwarts the implementation of these policies despite widespread public support